Publications
The record of our research.
Reports, briefs, working papers, and books — gathered as one citable, filterable archive of the Institute's published work.
№ 01
The record
Every publication
4 publications
dataset · May 2026
Emergency-powers statutes: a comparative database
Tariq Saleh، Hanan Al-Mansouri، Lina Karam
This Dataset catalogues the codified emergency-powers frameworks of 24 jurisdictions across five regions, with structured tagging across the five procedural features identified in the Institute's companion comparative Report. The Dataset is intended for use by researchers, practitioners, and legislators; it supports both the structured framework for assessing legislative proposals and broader cross-jurisdictional research on emergency-regime design.
Read →brief · May 2026
Consent and digital identity
Omar Faraj
Consent does difficult work in modern data law: it is asked to legitimate uses of personal data that are neither knowingly authorised in any meaningful sense nor practically refusable. This Brief examines the operational realities of consent in digital-identity systems and proposes procedural standards that recognise consent's limits while preserving its protective function.
Read →report · May 2026
Surveillance, privacy, and the rule of law
Omar Faraj
This Report examines how surveillance authorisations are reviewed in practice across five jurisdictions, focusing on the procedural standards that govern judicial or quasi-judicial approval. The Report finds that the formal availability of prior judicial authorisation correlates weakly with the substantive rigour of review, and identifies the institutional conditions under which procedural review functions as a meaningful constraint rather than as a rubber stamp.
Read →report · May 2026
Due process under emergency powers: a comparative review
Hanan Al-Mansouri، Sara Habib، Tariq Saleh
This Report compares the procedural architecture of emergency-powers regimes across eight constitutional systems, asking how each preserves — or fails to preserve — the due-process guarantees that ordinarily govern detention, judicial review, and the conduct of trials. Drawing on the comparative method developed in the Institute's Strategic Unit, the Report identifies five procedural features that distinguish bounded emergency regimes from those that drift toward executive consolidation, and offers a structured framework for assessing legislative proposals in this area.
Read →
Get in touch
Citing or republishing our work
For press inquiries, citation requests, or republication permissions, our team welcomes correspondence from scholars, journalists, and aligned organisations.